By M. V. Dougherty

The background of ethical drawback idea usually ignores the medieval interval, overlooking the subtle theorizing via numerous thinkers who debated the life of ethical dilemmas from 1150 to 1450. during this ebook Michael V. Dougherty deals a wealthy and engaging review of the debates that have been pursued via medieval philosophers, theologians and canon legal professionals, illustrating his dialogue with a various variety of examples of the ethical dilemmas which they thought of. He indicates that a lot of what turns out specific to twentieth-century ethical idea used to be famous some time past - specifically the view of a few medieval thinkers that a few kinds of wrongdoing are inescapable, and their emphasis at the precept 'choose the lesser of 2 evils'. His booklet can be invaluable not just to complex scholars and experts of medieval notion, but in addition to these attracted to the historical past of ethics.

Show description

Read or Download Moral Dilemmas in Medieval Thought: From Gratian to Aquinas PDF

Similar Middle Ages books

The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages, Revised and Expanded Edition

The center a while inherited from antiquity a practice of prophecy and gave it new lifestyles. this custom foretold a millennium within which humanity could get pleasure from a brand new paradise in the world, unfastened from pain and sin. this is often the tale of these millenarian fanaticisms, and issues to their patience within the smooth period.

Kingdoms and Communities in Western Europe 900-1300

This wide-ranging and perceptive booklet specializes in the collective values and actions of lay society over numerous centuries, from exchange guilds and manor courts to the improvement of parliaments and the guideline of feudal monarchs. It deals a brand new method of the background of medieval Europe. the second one variation of this significant research contains a mammoth new creation, which amplifies the arguments of the unique version and takes account of contemporary study.

Medieval Violence: Physical Brutality in Northern France, 1270-1330 (Oxford Historical Monographs)

Medieval Violence offers an in depth research of the perform of medieval brutality, concentrating on a thriving zone of northern France within the overdue 13th and early fourteenth centuries. It examines how violence was once conceptualised during this interval, and makes use of this framework to enquire highway violence, tavern brawls, city rebellions, scholar misbehaviour, and household violence.

The Worlds of Medieval Europe

The Worlds of Medieval Europe updates and revises conventional textbook representations of the center a long time by means of balancing the traditional concentrate on political beliefs, in particular these of northern Europe, with both distinct realization to medieval society because it built within the Mediterranean. the result's a nuanced portrayal of a multifarious western international that used to be sharply divided among its northern and southern elements.

Additional resources for Moral Dilemmas in Medieval Thought: From Gratian to Aquinas

Show sample text content

Whereas William (together with Augustine, and arguably with Plato in addition) contends that the person who retains the sword from the madman commits no evil, Alexander marks out a truly various place, even if all of them agree that the sword isn't to be again so long as the landlord is stricken by means of insanity. The Usurer’s cash trouble the subsequent case of corporeal perplexity universal to William and Alexander possesses a structural similarity to the previous quandary, yet a few major authentic transformations generate unusually refined analyses. rather than that includes the landlord of a sword who suffers from insanity, this instance shows an proprietor of cash who practices the vice of usury. William’s advertising of this instance is noteworthy as a result of his position in formulating the scholastic competition to usury. He used to be principally liable for framing the scholastic view that usury is intrinsically evil and opposite to the typical legislation, an outlook endured through Alexander and others.  The evidence of this hassle are: . The Usurer’s cash challenge A usurer deposits funds with one other, and the receiver swears to come back the cash while the usurer requests it. whilst later the usurer requests his cash, the receiver is perplexus, obliged to come it and never go back it. If the receiver returns it, he sins extra grievously than one that returns a sword to a mad individual, considering that to permit anyone to endure non secular demise is extra grave than to permit an individual to undergo physically demise. If he doesn't go back the cash, he violates his oath and impermissibly handles what's no longer his.  during this state of affairs, the argument protecting the prong of the predicament that holds the cash isn't to be back to the usurer is an a fortiori argument: because the items which are more likely to lead to physically demise (e. g. , a sword) are usually not be lower back, then extra strongly are the products that result in non secular demise likewise to not be again. As usury is taken into account a grave sin, the go back of the usurer’s funds might permit the usurer to sin gravely   John T. Noonan, Jr. , The Scholastic research of Usury (Cambridge, MA: Harvard collage Press, ), –. See Summa aurea, –; Summa Halesiana, . ethical dilemmas of the corporeal perplexity style  and hence undergo a religious dying. the opposite prong of the quandary that argues for go back of the money is, after all, grounded at the presumed compulsory nature of oaths, because the receiver of the cash had promised to come back it upon being requested. unusually, in examining this drawback either William and Alexander deny the analogy among it and the Madman’s Sword hassle, and so they contend that the money can be back to the usurer. the major section of the disanalogy is that the usurer is in ownership of his psychological schools, while the madman, by means of definition, isn't. William notes that “we have no idea even if that usurer has the desire of devoting that cash for usury (nescimus enim si ille usurarius voluntatem habeat dandi pecuniam illam advert usuram). ” up to now Alexander provides that because the usurer is within the ownership of his brain (mens), one needs to presume that the Lord may well deliver the usurer to take advantage of the cash good, so the agent don't need to imagine that the cash may be used usuriously.

Rated 4.08 of 5 – based on 36 votes