By Jonathan Sacks

***2015 nationwide Jewish publication Award Winner***

In this robust and well timed e-book, probably the most sought after and authoritative non secular leaders of our time tackles the phenomenon of spiritual extremism and violence dedicated within the identify of God. If faith is perceived as being a part of the matter, Rabbi Sacks argues, then it should also shape a part of the answer. while faith turns into a zero-sum conceit—that is, my faith is the one correct route to God, accordingly your faith is by way of definition wrong—and everyone is prompted via what Rabbi Sacks calls “altruistic evil,” violence among peoples of alternative ideals seems to be the single traditional outcome.
 
yet via an exploration of the roots of violence and its courting to faith, and using groundbreaking biblical research and interpretation, Rabbi Sacks indicates that religiously encouraged violence has as its resource misreadings of biblical texts on the middle of all 3 Abrahamic faiths. by means of having a look anew on the ebook of Genesis, with its foundational tales of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Rabbi Sacks bargains a thorough rereading of the various Bible’s seminal tales of sibling contention: Cain and Abel, Isaac and Ishmael, Jacob and Esau, Joseph and his brothers, Rachel and Leah.
 
“Abraham himself,” writes Rabbi Sacks, “sought to be a blessing to others despite their religion. that concept, overlooked for lots of of the intervening centuries, is still the best definition of Abrahamic religion. it's not our activity to beat or convert the area or implement uniformity of trust. it truly is our job to be a blessing to the realm. using faith for political ends isn't righteousness yet idolatry . . . To invoke God to justify violence opposed to the blameless isn't really an act of sanctity yet of sacrilege.” here's an eloquent demand humans of goodwill from all faiths and none to face jointly, confront the spiritual extremism that threatens to ruin us, and claim: now not in God’s identify.

Show description

Read Online or Download Not in God's Name: Confronting Religious Violence PDF

Similar Christianity books

Sin No More (The Reverend Curtis Black Series)

A guy who as soon as thrived on wickedness and counted on forgiveness, Curtis Black has replaced his methods. again within the center of his congregation and his kin, he'll not stray from the crushed course. Or so he is promised his long-suffering spouse, Charlotte. however the sins of the previous have unusual methods of coming to gentle.

The Last Crusade: The Epic Voyages of Vasco da Gama

HistorianNigel Cliff grants a sweeping, radical reinterpretation of Vasco da Gama’spioneering voyages, revealing their value as a decisive turning element inthe fight among Christianity and Islam—a sequence of occasions which foreveraltered the connection among East and West. excellent for readers of Endurance:Shackleton’s wonderful Voyage, Galileo’sDaughter, and Atlantic, this first-ever completeaccount of da Gama’s voyages contains new details from the recentlydiscovered diaries of his sailors and a unprecedented sequence of lettersbetween da Gama and the Zamorin, a king of modern-dayKerala, India.

The Story of the Scrolls

From the world's major lifeless Sea Scrolls student, Geza Vermes' the tale of the Scrolls: The marvelous Discovery and actual value of the useless Sea Scrolls is a perfect creation to figuring out those historical records. the invention of the useless Sea Scrolls in Qumran, among 1947 and 1956, used to be one of many maximum archeological unearths of all time.

Martin Luther: A Life (Penguin Lives)

Referred to as ? the main influential interpreter of yankee faith? by means of invoice Moyers, well known historian and Lutheran pastor Martin Marty portrays the spiritual reformer Martin Luther as a guy of moral sense and braveness who risked loss of life to ignite the old reformation of the Church. Luther? s arguments, together with his ?

Additional info for Not in God's Name: Confronting Religious Violence

Show sample text content

Esau stated to his father, ‘Do you could have just one blessing, my father? Bless me too, my father. ’ Then Esau wept aloud. (Gen. 27:30–38) analyzing this passage, we can't yet establish with Isaac and Esau, now not Jacob. We believe the father’s surprise – ‘Isaac trembled violently’ – as he realises that his more youthful son has deceived him. We empathise with Esau, whose first concept isn't anger opposed to his brother yet uncomplicated love for Isaac: ‘Bless me – me too, my father. ’ Then comes Isaac’s helplessness – ‘So what am i able to probably do for you, my son? ’ – and Esau’s weeping, all of the extra poignant given what we all know of him, that he's powerful, a hunter, a guy now not given to tears. The scene of the 2 jointly, robbed of what must have been a second of tenderness and intimacy – son feeding father, father blessing son – is deeply affecting. there's just one different scene love it within the Pentateuch: Hagar and Ishmael, on my own within the warmth of the wilderness, with out water, approximately to die. The comparability is planned. simply as there, so right here, our sympathies are being enlisted on behalf of the elder son. there's one other discrepant observe. without warning, Isaac does have the ability to supply Esau a blessing: The fats locations of earth can nonetheless be your residing. [You can nonetheless have] the dew of heaven. yet you shall reside through your sword. you could have to serve your brother, but if your lawsuits mount up, you'll throw his yoke off your neck. (Gen. 27:39–40) The ‘fat areas of earth’ and the ‘dew of heaven’ are ample sufficient, Isaac implies, for there to be adequate for either sons. extra major is his qualification of Jacob’s supremacy. it is going to final, he says, in basic terms so long as he doesn't misuse it. If he acts harshly, Esau will ‘throw his yoke off’ his neck. For the 1st time, a doubt enters our realizing of the brothers’ respective fates. previously we have been resulted in think that the narrative had reached closure. The elder (Esau) will serve the more youthful (Jacob). So Rebekah used to be instructed; so Isaac stated in his first blessing. Now, it really is unexpectedly much less transparent. maybe Esau won't serve Jacob in spite of everything. might be Jacob will misuse his strength and Esau will insurgent – a small incongruity, yet an important one. the true doubt, besides the fact that, lies within the means the textual content describes Jacob’s behavior. no matter what else the covenant is, we consider, it can't be this: a blessing taken by means of deceit, a future bought by way of cover. Did God no longer say of Abraham, ‘I have recognized him in order that he might tutor his young children and his family after him to maintain the way in which of the Lord, doing what's correct and simply’ (Gen. 18:19)? Righteousness, justice, integrity, fact – those are keywords of covenantal ethics, and we pressure to work out how they can be utilized to Jacob’s behavior in the direction of his blind father. along with which, Isaac could have been deceived, yet was once God? the belief is absurd. Had God sought after the blessing to visit Jacob, now not Esau, he could have advised Isaac, as he advised Abraham approximately Isaac and Ishmael. there's barely enough discord to make us wonder whether we've learn the tale properly. finally we are going to detect that our unease was once justified and that not anything within the tale is because it turns out – yet in basic terms on the finish.

Rated 4.93 of 5 – based on 19 votes