By Nihal Jayawickrama

The unique human rights thoughts articulated within the 1948 common assertion have developed significantly. Nihal Jayawickrama encapsulates the judicial interpretation of human rights legislations from all on hand assets in a single complete quantity, overlaying improved court docket case legislation of over fifty-five nations, the jurisprudence of the U.N. Human Rights tracking our bodies, the eu courtroom of Human Rights, and the Inter-American process. This definitive compendium should be crucial for felony practitioners, govt and non-governmental officers, and lecturers and scholars of constitutional legislation and the foreign legislations of human rights.

Show description

Read Online or Download The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law: National, Regional and International Jurisprudence PDF

Best Law books

McGraw-Hill's Torts for Paralegals

Torts for Paralegals explores the wide range of civil wrongs which may damage a person and the treatments on hand to that injured occasion. using many sensible studying instruments, the textual content is a step by step method in knowing inner most harms and proving their prima facie components. The textual content is written in a truly concise and sequential demeanour, starting with intentional torts, carrying on with in the course of the steps of negligence, and completing with the various liabilities and corporation legislations.

Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law

“I have studied Rosen’s ebook intimately and am inspired with its scope and content material. I strongly suggest it to anyone attracted to the present controversies surrounding open resource licensing. ” —John Terpstra, Samba. org; cofounder, Samba-Team “Linux and open resource software program have without end altered the computing panorama.

Medical Law and Ethics (5th Edition)

For all classes in scientific legislations and/or ethics in courses for nurses, scientific assistants, and all allied overall healthiness care professions whole, available, and up to date Written for future health pros of all kinds—not legal professionals— clinical legislation and Ethics covers the complete spectrum of themes that have an effect on perform.

A Wilderness of Error: The Trials of Jeffrey MacDonald

Academy Award–winning filmmaker Errol Morris examines probably the most infamous and mysterious homicide trials of the 20 th centuryIn this profoundly unique meditation on fact and the justice approach, Errol Morris—a former deepest detective and director of the skinny Blue Line—delves deeply into the notorious Jeffrey MacDonald homicide case.

Extra info for The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law: National, Regional and International Jurisprudence

Show sample text content

359/1989 and 385/1989, 31 March 1993 184 Barbato v. Uruguay, communique No. 84/1981, HRC 1983 record, Annex IX 264 xvi desk of circumstances Barrett and Sutcliffe v. Jamaica, verbal exchange Nos. 270/1988 and 271/1988, HRC 1992 document, Annex IX. F 324 Barroso v. Panama, verbal exchange No. 473/1991, HRC 1995 document, Annex X. F 557 Barzhig v. France, conversation No. 327/1988, HRC 1991 file, Annex XI. F 574 Bazzano v. Uruguay, conversation No. 5/1977, HRC 1979 record, Annex VII 318 Bequio v. Uruguay, communique No. 88/1981, HRC 1983 document, Annex XXII 318 Berry v. Jamaica, conversation No. 330/1988, HRC 1994 record, Annex IX. D 290, 296, 576 Bhinder v. Canada, conversation No. 208/1986, HRC 1990 file, Annex IX. E 660, 836 Birindwa and Tshisekedi v. Zaire, conversation Nos. 241 and 242/1987, HRC 1990 file, Annex IX. I 444 Bleier v. Uruguay, communique No. 30/1978, HRC 1982 document, Annex X fifty five Blom v. Sweden, communique No. 191/1985, HRC 1988 record, Annex VII. E 839 Bolanos v. Ecuador, verbal exchange No. 238/1987, HRC 1989 document, Annex X. I 412, 508 Bouton v. Uruguay, conversation No. 37/1978, HRC 1981 document, Annex XIV 301 Brinkhof v. Netherlands, conversation No. 402/1990, 27 July 1993 837 Broeks v. Netherlands, verbal exchange No. 172/1984, HRC 1987 file, Annex VIII. B 177, 818, 833 Brown v. Jamaica, communique No. 775/1997, HRC 1999 document, Annex XI. GG 569 Burgos v. Uruguay, communique No. R. 21/52/1979, HRC 1981 file, Annex XIX 564 Burrell v. Jamaica, conversation No. 546/1993, HRC 1996 file, Annex R 278, 289 Bwalya v. Zambia, verbal exchange No. 314/1988, 14 July 1993 376 Cabreira v. Uruguay, communique No. 105/1981, HRC 1983 file, Annex XXI 431 Cadoret v. France, conversation No. 221/1987, HRC 1991 record, Annex IX. A 508 table of circumstances xvii Caldas v. Uruguay, conversation No. 43/1979, HRC 1983 record, Annex XVIII 399, 430, 555 Camargo v. Colombia, conversation No. 45/1979, HRC 1982 record, Annex XI 243, 270, 279 Campbell (Glenford) v. Jamaica, verbal exchange No. 248/1987, HRC 1992 document, Annex IX. D 289, 566, 576 Campbell (John) v. Jamaica, verbal exchange No. 307/1988, 24 March 1993 507 Canepa v. Canada, verbal exchange No. 558/1993, HRC 1997 record, Annex VI. ok 476, 604 Carballal v. Uruguay, verbal exchange No. 33/1978, HRC 1981 file, Annex XI 301 Cariboni v. Uruguay, communique No. 159/1983, HRC 1988 record, Annex VII. A 301 Casariego v. Uruguay, verbal exchange No. 56/1979, HRC 1981 file, Annex XX 378, 430 Celepli v. Sweden, verbal exchange No. 456/1991, HRC 1994 file, Annex IX. Z 444 Chaplin v. Jamaica, communique No. 596/94, HRC 1995 document, Annex VIII. Y 324 CLD v. France, verbal exchange No. 228/1987, HRC 1988 record, Annex VIII. E 850 Coeriel and Aurik v. Netherlands, conversation No. 453/1991, HRC 1995 file, Annex X. D 604, 616 Collins v. Jamaica, verbal exchange No. 240/1987, HRC 1992 record, Annex IX. C 501, 522 Collins v. Jamaica, verbal exchange No. 356/1989, 25 March 1993 557 Compass v. Jamaica, communique No. 375/1989, 19 October 1993 571 Conteris v. Uruguay, communique No.

Rated 4.84 of 5 – based on 5 votes
Category : Law