By J. P. Mallory

This booklet introduces Proto-Indo-European, describes the way it used to be reconstructed from its descendant languages, and exhibits what it finds concerning the those who spoke it among 5,500 and 8,000 years in the past. utilizing similar proof from archaeology and typical heritage the authors discover the lives, techniques, passions, tradition, society, financial system, background, and atmosphere of the Proto-Indo-Europeans. They contain chapters on fauna, flowers, relatives and kinship, garments and textiles, food and drinks, area and time, feelings, mythology, and faith, and describe the search to find the Proto-Indo-European homeland.

Show description

Read or Download The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World (Oxford Linguistics) PDF

Similar Linguistics books

Oxymoronica: Paradoxical Wit & Wisdom From History's Greatest Wordsmiths

Ox-y-mor-on-i-ca (OK-se-mor-ON-uh-ca) noun, plural: Any number of tantalizing, self-contradictory statements or observations that at the floor look fake or illogical, yet at a deeper point are precise, usually profoundly precise. See additionally oxymoron, paradox. examples:"Melancholy is the excitement of being unhappy.

Gwynne's Latin: The Ultimate Introduction to Latin Including the Latin in Everyday English

The last word advisor to Latin, for its personal sake, to enhance your English, and to make you higher at every little thing else Latin is "it", the main remarkable "thing". it really is mind-enhancing, character-improving, mesmerizing, intriguing, deeply pleasant, and worthwhile. My good decision is to spare no pains to do it the justice that its significance calls for.

The Phonology of Standard Chinese (The Phonology of the World's Languages)

The totally revised variation of San Duanmu's well known advent to chinese language phonology displays fresh learn and theoretical advances specifically paintings in function, syllable, and tension. the writer has additionally additional a bankruptcy on rhythm in poetry.

About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics)

This ebook considers the semantic and syntactic nature of indexicals - linguistic expressions, as in I, you, this, that, the day gone by, the following day, whose reference shifts from utterance to utterance. there's a long-standing controversy as to if the semantic reference aspect is already current as syntactic fabric or if it is brought post-syntactically through semantic principles of interpretation.

Extra info for The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World (Oxford Linguistics)

Show sample text content

The grouping of Indo-Iranian jointly isn't really dependent completely at the seen similarities among the languages but additionally definite universal suggestions. there are many phrases that take place in either Indic and Iranian yet now not in the other Indo-European language. a few of these predicament spiritual ideas, e. g. ProtoIndo-Iranian *atharwan- ‘priest’, *r 8sˇi- ‘seer’, *uc´ig- ‘sacriWcing priest’, *anc´u‘soma plant’. either the traditional Indo-Aryans and Iranians drank the juices of the pressed soma plant (Indo-Iranian *sauma > Sanskrit soma and Avestan haoma). furthermore, there also are a few names of shared deities in addition to a chain of animal names (hedgehog, tortoise, pigeon, donkey, he-goat, wild boar, and camel), architectural names (pit, canal, apartment, peg), and numerous different phrases. those universal parts recommend that the Proto-Indo-Iranians borrowed yes phrases from a possibly non-Indo-European tradition earlier than they begun their divergence into separate subgroups. five. 1. three Balto-Slavic even if there are nonetheless a few (more frequently Balticists than Slavicists) to contest the shut organization of Baltic and Slavic, majority opinion most likely favours a typical proto-language among Proto-Indo-European and the Baltic and Slavic languages, i. e. in the course of or after the dissolution of Proto-Indo-European there has been a level of Proto-Balto-Slavic earlier than the separation of the 2 language teams. This proto-language won't have passed through an easy break up into Proto-Baltic and Proto-Slavic. one other hazard frequently recommend is that Balto-Slavic grew to become divided into 3 subgroups: East Baltic (Lithuanian and Latvian), West Baltic (Old Prussian), and Slavic. at the least the 2 teams (Baltic and Slavic) or the 3 teams (East Baltic, West Baltic, and Slavic) remained in shut geographical and cultural touch with each other 78 five. RELATIONSHIPS and feature persevered to inXuence each other lengthy after the preliminary department into separate teams. They percentage a couple of goods of vocabulary no longer present in different Indo-European teams in addition to new grammatical positive aspects akin to the deWnite adjective outfitted at the adjective plus the relative pronoun *yos, new accessory and comparative adjective styles, and so on. (Oszwald Szemere´nyi lists fourteen even though greater than part are disputed). what's quite fascinating is that the Balto-Slavic languages are satem languages like Indo-Iranian and a few recommend a few kind of ancient connection among the 2 supergroups. as well as satemization, most of these teams obey what's often called the ruki-rule, i. e. *s is palatalized to *sˇ after *r, *u, *k, or *i, e. g. Grk te´rsomai ‘I develop into dry’ yet Skt tr 8sya´ti ‘he thirsts’, Av tarsˇna- ‘thirst’, Lith tir~sˇtas ‘thirst’. _ five. 1. four touch teams? there are various different proposed relationships. a few argue that similarities among Greek and Armenian are such that there has been a typical GraecoArmenian, whereas Italo-Celtic has been one other lengthy instructed and simply as often rejected proposition. In either one of those situations, we don't require a proto-language among Proto-Indo-European and the person languages as we do with Indo-Iranian, and so the case for those different units seriously isn't as powerful because it is for Indo-Iranian and Balto-Slavic.

Rated 4.75 of 5 – based on 26 votes